Skip to contents

Point-estimates of posterior distributions

Source: R/point_estimate.R
point_estimate.Rd

Compute various point-estimates, such as the mean, the median or the MAP, to describe posterior distributions.

Usage

point_estimate(x, ...)

# S3 method for class 'numeric'
point_estimate(x, centrality = "all", dispersion = FALSE, threshold = 0.1, ...)

# S3 method for class 'data.frame'
point_estimate(
  x,
  centrality = "all",
  dispersion = FALSE,
  threshold = 0.1,
  rvar_col = NULL,
  ...
)

# S3 method for class 'brmsfit'
point_estimate(
  x,
  centrality = "all",
  dispersion = FALSE,
  effects = "fixed",
  component = "conditional",
  parameters = NULL,
  ...
)

# S3 method for class 'get_predicted'
point_estimate(
  x,
  centrality = "all",
  dispersion = FALSE,
  use_iterations = FALSE,
  verbose = TRUE,
  ...
)

Arguments

x

Vector representing a posterior distribution, or a data frame of such vectors. Can also be a Bayesian model. bayestestR supports a wide range of models (see, for example, methods("hdi")) and not all of those are documented in the 'Usage' section, because methods for other classes mostly resemble the arguments of the .numeric or .data.framemethods.

...

Additional arguments to be passed to or from methods.

centrality

The point-estimates (centrality indices) to compute. Character (vector) or list with one or more of these options: "median", "mean", "MAP" (see map_estimate()), "trimmed" (which is just mean(x, trim = threshold)), "mode" or "all".

dispersion

Logical, if TRUE, computes indices of dispersion related to the estimate(s) (SD and MAD for mean and median, respectively). Dispersion is not available for "MAP" or "mode" centrality indices.

threshold

For centrality = "trimmed" (i.e. trimmed mean), indicates the fraction (0 to 0.5) of observations to be trimmed from each end of the vector before the mean is computed.

rvar_col

A single character - the name of an rvar column in the data frame to be processed. See example in p_direction().

effects

Should results for fixed effects ("fixed", the default), random effects ("random") or both ("all") be returned? Only applies to mixed models. May be abbreviated.

component

Which type of parameters to return, such as parameters for the conditional model, the zero-inflated part of the model, the dispersion term, etc. See details in section Model Components. May be abbreviated. Note that the conditional component also refers to the count or mean component - names may differ, depending on the modeling package. There are three convenient shortcuts (not applicable to all model classes):

  • component = "all" returns all possible parameters.

  • If component = "location", location parameters such as conditional, zero_inflated, smooth_terms, or instruments are returned (everything that are fixed or random effects - depending on the effects argument - but no auxiliary parameters).

  • For component = "distributional" (or "auxiliary"), components like sigma, dispersion, beta or precision (and other auxiliary parameters) are returned.

parameters

Regular expression pattern that describes the parameters that should be returned. Meta-parameters (like lp__ or prior_) are filtered by default, so only parameters that typically appear in the summary() are returned. Use parameters to select specific parameters for the output.

use_iterations

Logical, if TRUE and x is a get_predicted object, (returned by insight::get_predicted()), the function is applied to the iterations instead of the predictions. This only applies to models that return iterations for predicted values (e.g., brmsfit models).

verbose

Toggle off warnings.

Note

There is also a plot()-method implemented in the see-package.

Model components

Possible values for the component argument depend on the model class. Following are valid options:

  • "all": returns all model components, applies to all models, but will only have an effect for models with more than just the conditional model component.

  • "conditional": only returns the conditional component, i.e. "fixed effects" terms from the model. Will only have an effect for models with more than just the conditional model component.

  • "smooth_terms": returns smooth terms, only applies to GAMs (or similar models that may contain smooth terms).

  • "zero_inflated" (or "zi"): returns the zero-inflation component.

  • "location": returns location parameters such as conditional, zero_inflated, or smooth_terms (everything that are fixed or random effects - depending on the effects argument - but no auxiliary parameters).

  • "distributional" (or "auxiliary"): components like sigma, dispersion, beta or precision (and other auxiliary parameters) are returned.

For models of class brmsfit (package brms), even more options are possible for the component argument, which are not all documented in detail here. See also ?insight::find_parameters.

References

Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., and Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. Frontiers in Psychology 2019;10:2767. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767

Examples

library(bayestestR)

point_estimate(rnorm(1000))
#> Point Estimate
#> 
#> Median   | Mean |  MAP
#> ----------------------
#> 5.58e-03 | 0.01 | 0.03
point_estimate(rnorm(1000), centrality = "all", dispersion = TRUE)
#> Point Estimate
#> 
#> Median |  MAD |      Mean |   SD |  MAP
#> ---------------------------------------
#> -0.02  | 0.97 | -5.33e-03 | 1.00 | 0.05
point_estimate(rnorm(1000), centrality = c("median", "MAP"))
#> Point Estimate
#> 
#> Median |   MAP
#> --------------
#> 0.03   | -0.07

df <- data.frame(replicate(4, rnorm(100)))
point_estimate(df, centrality = "all", dispersion = TRUE)
#> Point Estimate
#> 
#> Parameter | Median |  MAD |  Mean |   SD |   MAP
#> ------------------------------------------------
#> X1        |  -0.02 | 1.21 |  0.02 | 1.12 |  0.85
#> X2        |  -0.07 | 1.07 | -0.10 | 1.00 | -0.18
#> X3        |  -0.29 | 1.02 | -0.33 | 0.89 | -0.10
#> X4        |  -0.08 | 0.90 | -0.14 | 0.89 |  0.11
point_estimate(df, centrality = c("median", "MAP"))
#> Point Estimate
#> 
#> Parameter | Median |   MAP
#> --------------------------
#> X1        |  -0.02 |  0.85
#> X2        |  -0.07 | -0.18
#> X3        |  -0.29 | -0.10
#> X4        |  -0.08 |  0.11
# \donttest{
# rstanarm models
# -----------------------------------------------
model <- rstanarm::stan_glm(mpg ~ wt + cyl, data = mtcars)
#> 
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
#> Chain 1: 
#> Chain 1: Gradient evaluation took 2.2e-05 seconds
#> Chain 1: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.22 seconds.
#> Chain 1: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 1: 
#> Chain 1: 
#> Chain 1: Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: 
#> Chain 1:  Elapsed Time: 0.042 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 1:                0.04 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 1:                0.082 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 1: 
#> 
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
#> Chain 2: 
#> Chain 2: Gradient evaluation took 1.1e-05 seconds
#> Chain 2: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.11 seconds.
#> Chain 2: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 2: 
#> Chain 2: 
#> Chain 2: Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: 
#> Chain 2:  Elapsed Time: 0.044 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 2:                0.039 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 2:                0.083 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 2: 
#> 
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
#> Chain 3: 
#> Chain 3: Gradient evaluation took 1.3e-05 seconds
#> Chain 3: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.13 seconds.
#> Chain 3: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 3: 
#> Chain 3: 
#> Chain 3: Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: 
#> Chain 3:  Elapsed Time: 0.043 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 3:                0.047 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 3:                0.09 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 3: 
#> 
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
#> Chain 4: 
#> Chain 4: Gradient evaluation took 1.1e-05 seconds
#> Chain 4: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.11 seconds.
#> Chain 4: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 4: 
#> Chain 4: 
#> Chain 4: Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: 
#> Chain 4:  Elapsed Time: 0.044 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 4:                0.04 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 4:                0.084 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 4: 
point_estimate(model, centrality = "all", dispersion = TRUE)
#> Point Estimate 
#> 
#> Parameter   | Median |  MAD |  Mean |   SD |   MAP
#> --------------------------------------------------
#> (Intercept) |  39.65 | 1.86 | 39.69 | 1.84 | 39.57
#> wt          |  -3.19 | 0.81 | -3.18 | 0.82 | -3.19
#> cyl         |  -1.51 | 0.44 | -1.52 | 0.44 | -1.54
point_estimate(model, centrality = c("median", "MAP"))
#> Point Estimate 
#> 
#> Parameter   | Median |   MAP
#> ----------------------------
#> (Intercept) |  39.65 | 39.57
#> wt          |  -3.19 | -3.19
#> cyl         |  -1.51 | -1.54


# emmeans estimates
# -----------------------------------------------
point_estimate(
  emmeans::emtrends(model, ~1, "wt", data = mtcars),
  centrality = c("median", "MAP")
)
#> Point Estimate
#> 
#> X1      | Median |   MAP
#> ------------------------
#> overall |  -3.19 | -3.19

# brms models
# -----------------------------------------------
model <- brms::brm(mpg ~ wt + cyl, data = mtcars)
#> Compiling Stan program...
#> Start sampling
#> 
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'anon_model' NOW (CHAIN 1).
#> Chain 1: 
#> Chain 1: Gradient evaluation took 1e-05 seconds
#> Chain 1: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.1 seconds.
#> Chain 1: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 1: 
#> Chain 1: 
#> Chain 1: Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 1: 
#> Chain 1:  Elapsed Time: 0.02 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 1:                0.019 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 1:                0.039 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 1: 
#> 
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'anon_model' NOW (CHAIN 2).
#> Chain 2: 
#> Chain 2: Gradient evaluation took 3e-06 seconds
#> Chain 2: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.03 seconds.
#> Chain 2: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 2: 
#> Chain 2: 
#> Chain 2: Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 2: 
#> Chain 2:  Elapsed Time: 0.02 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 2:                0.017 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 2:                0.037 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 2: 
#> 
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'anon_model' NOW (CHAIN 3).
#> Chain 3: 
#> Chain 3: Gradient evaluation took 3e-06 seconds
#> Chain 3: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.03 seconds.
#> Chain 3: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 3: 
#> Chain 3: 
#> Chain 3: Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 3: 
#> Chain 3:  Elapsed Time: 0.019 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 3:                0.019 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 3:                0.038 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 3: 
#> 
#> SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'anon_model' NOW (CHAIN 4).
#> Chain 4: 
#> Chain 4: Gradient evaluation took 3e-06 seconds
#> Chain 4: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.03 seconds.
#> Chain 4: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
#> Chain 4: 
#> Chain 4: 
#> Chain 4: Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
#> Chain 4: 
#> Chain 4:  Elapsed Time: 0.019 seconds (Warm-up)
#> Chain 4:                0.018 seconds (Sampling)
#> Chain 4:                0.037 seconds (Total)
#> Chain 4: 
point_estimate(model, centrality = "all", dispersion = TRUE)
#> Point Estimate 
#> 
#> Parameter   | Median |  MAD |  Mean |   SD |   MAP
#> --------------------------------------------------
#> (Intercept) |  39.67 | 1.71 | 39.67 | 1.78 | 39.86
#> wt          |  -3.22 | 0.78 | -3.20 | 0.80 | -3.32
#> cyl         |  -1.49 | 0.44 | -1.50 | 0.43 | -1.46
point_estimate(model, centrality = c("median", "MAP"))
#> Point Estimate 
#> 
#> Parameter   | Median |   MAP
#> ----------------------------
#> (Intercept) |  39.67 | 39.86
#> wt          |  -3.22 | -3.32
#> cyl         |  -1.49 | -1.46

# BayesFactor objects
# -----------------------------------------------
bf <- BayesFactor::ttestBF(x = rnorm(100, 1, 1))
point_estimate(bf, centrality = "all", dispersion = TRUE)
#> Point Estimate
#> 
#> Parameter  | Median |  MAD | Mean |   SD |  MAP
#> -----------------------------------------------
#> Difference |   1.03 | 0.11 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 1.02
point_estimate(bf, centrality = c("median", "MAP"))
#> Point Estimate
#> 
#> Parameter  | Median |  MAP
#> --------------------------
#> Difference |   1.03 | 1.04
# }