Skip to contents

report

CRAN downloads R-CMD-check status

“From R to your manuscript”

report’s primary goal is to bridge the gap between R’s output and the formatted results contained in your manuscript. It automatically produces reports of models and data frames according to best practices guidelines (e.g., APA’s style), ensuring standardization and quality in results reporting.

library(report)

model <- lm(Sepal.Length ~ Species, data = iris)
report(model)
# We fitted a linear model (estimated using OLS) to predict Sepal.Length with
# Species (formula: Sepal.Length ~ Species). The model explains a statistically
# significant and substantial proportion of variance (R2 = 0.62, F(2, 147) =
# 119.26, p < .001, adj. R2 = 0.61). The model's intercept, corresponding to
# Species = setosa, is at 5.01 (95% CI [4.86, 5.15], t(147) = 68.76, p < .001).
# Within this model:
# 
#   - The effect of Species [versicolor] is statistically significant and positive
# (beta = 0.93, 95% CI [0.73, 1.13], t(147) = 9.03, p < .001; Std. beta = 1.12,
# 95% CI [0.88, 1.37])
#   - The effect of Species [virginica] is statistically significant and positive
# (beta = 1.58, 95% CI [1.38, 1.79], t(147) = 15.37, p < .001; Std. beta = 1.91,
# 95% CI [1.66, 2.16])
# 
# Standardized parameters were obtained by fitting the model on a standardized
# version of the dataset. 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) and p-values were
# computed using a Wald t-distribution approximation.

Installation

The package is available on CRAN and can be downloaded by running:

If you would instead like to experiment with the development version, you can download it from GitHub:

install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("easystats/report") # You only need to do that once

Load the package every time you start R

Tip

Instead of library(datawizard), use library(easystats). This will make all features of the easystats-ecosystem available.

To stay updated, use easystats::install_latest().

Documentation

The package documentation can be found here.

Report all the things

General Workflow

The report package works in a two step fashion. First, you create a report object with the report() function. Then, this report object can be displayed either textually (the default output) or as a table, using as.data.frame(). Moreover, you can also access a more digest and compact version of the report using summary() on the report object.

workflow

The report() function works on a variety of models, as well as other objects such as dataframes:

report(iris)
# The data contains 150 observations of the following 5 variables:
# 
#   - Sepal.Length: n = 150, Mean = 5.84, SD = 0.83, Median = 5.80, MAD = 1.04,
# range: [4.30, 7.90], Skewness = 0.31, Kurtosis = -0.55, 0% missing
#   - Sepal.Width: n = 150, Mean = 3.06, SD = 0.44, Median = 3.00, MAD = 0.44,
# range: [2, 4.40], Skewness = 0.32, Kurtosis = 0.23, 0% missing
#   - Petal.Length: n = 150, Mean = 3.76, SD = 1.77, Median = 4.35, MAD = 1.85,
# range: [1, 6.90], Skewness = -0.27, Kurtosis = -1.40, 0% missing
#   - Petal.Width: n = 150, Mean = 1.20, SD = 0.76, Median = 1.30, MAD = 1.04,
# range: [0.10, 2.50], Skewness = -0.10, Kurtosis = -1.34, 0% missing
#   - Species: 3 levels, namely setosa (n = 50, 33.33%), versicolor (n = 50,
# 33.33%) and virginica (n = 50, 33.33%)

These reports nicely work within the tidyverse workflow:

iris %>%
  select(-starts_with("Sepal")) %>%
  group_by(Species) %>%
  report() %>%
  summary()
# The data contains 150 observations, grouped by Species, of the following 3
# variables:
# 
# - setosa (n = 50):
#   - Petal.Length: Mean = 1.46, SD = 0.17, range: [1, 1.90]
#   - Petal.Width: Mean = 0.25, SD = 0.11, range: [0.10, 0.60]
# 
# - versicolor (n = 50):
#   - Petal.Length: Mean = 4.26, SD = 0.47, range: [3, 5.10]
#   - Petal.Width: Mean = 1.33, SD = 0.20, range: [1, 1.80]
# 
# - virginica (n = 50):
#   - Petal.Length: Mean = 5.55, SD = 0.55, range: [4.50, 6.90]
#   - Petal.Width: Mean = 2.03, SD = 0.27, range: [1.40, 2.50]

t-tests and correlations

Reports can be used to automatically format tests like t-tests or correlations.

report(t.test(mtcars$mpg ~ mtcars$am))
# Effect sizes were labelled following Cohen's (1988) recommendations.
# 
# The Welch Two Sample t-test testing the difference of mtcars$mpg by mtcars$am
# (mean in group 0 = 17.15, mean in group 1 = 24.39) suggests that the effect is
# negative, statistically significant, and large (difference = -7.24, 95% CI
# [-11.28, -3.21], t(18.33) = -3.77, p = 0.001; Cohen's d = -1.41, 95% CI [-2.26,
# -0.53])

As mentioned, you can also create tables with the as.data.frame() functions, like for example with this correlation test:

cor.test(iris$Sepal.Length, iris$Sepal.Width) %>%
  report() %>%
  as.data.frame()
# Pearson's product-moment correlation
# 
# Parameter1        |       Parameter2 |     r |        95% CI | t(148) |     p
# -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# iris$Sepal.Length | iris$Sepal.Width | -0.12 | [-0.27, 0.04] |  -1.44 | 0.152
# 
# Alternative hypothesis: two.sided

ANOVAs

This works great with ANOVAs, as it includes effect sizes and their interpretation.

aov(Sepal.Length ~ Species, data = iris) %>%
  report()
# The ANOVA (formula: Sepal.Length ~ Species) suggests that:
# 
#   - The main effect of Species is statistically significant and large (F(2, 147)
# = 119.26, p < .001; Eta2 = 0.62, 95% CI [0.54, 1.00])
# 
# Effect sizes were labelled following Field's (2013) recommendations.

Generalized Linear Models (GLMs)

Reports are also compatible with GLMs, such as this logistic regression:

model <- glm(vs ~ mpg * drat, data = mtcars, family = "binomial")

report(model)
# We fitted a logistic model (estimated using ML) to predict vs with mpg and drat
# (formula: vs ~ mpg * drat). The model's explanatory power is substantial
# (Tjur's R2 = 0.51). The model's intercept, corresponding to mpg = 0 and drat =
# 0, is at -33.43 (95% CI [-77.90, 3.25], p = 0.083). Within this model:
# 
#   - The effect of mpg is statistically non-significant and positive (beta = 1.79,
# 95% CI [-0.10, 4.05], p = 0.066; Std. beta = 3.63, 95% CI [1.36, 7.50])
#   - The effect of drat is statistically non-significant and positive (beta =
# 5.96, 95% CI [-3.75, 16.26], p = 0.205; Std. beta = -0.36, 95% CI [-1.96,
# 0.98])
#   - The effect of mpg × drat is statistically non-significant and negative (beta
# = -0.33, 95% CI [-0.83, 0.15], p = 0.141; Std. beta = -1.07, 95% CI [-2.66,
# 0.48])
# 
# Standardized parameters were obtained by fitting the model on a standardized
# version of the dataset. 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) and p-values were
# computed using a Wald z-distribution approximation.

Mixed Models

Mixed models, whose popularity and usage is exploding, can also be reported:

library(lme4)

model <- lme4::lmer(Sepal.Length ~ Petal.Length + (1 | Species), data = iris)

report(model)
# We fitted a linear mixed model (estimated using REML and nloptwrap optimizer)
# to predict Sepal.Length with Petal.Length (formula: Sepal.Length ~
# Petal.Length). The model included Species as random effect (formula: ~1 |
# Species). The model's total explanatory power is substantial (conditional R2 =
# 0.97) and the part related to the fixed effects alone (marginal R2) is of 0.66.
# The model's intercept, corresponding to Petal.Length = 0, is at 2.50 (95% CI
# [1.19, 3.82], t(146) = 3.75, p < .001). Within this model:
# 
#   - The effect of Petal Length is statistically significant and positive (beta =
# 0.89, 95% CI [0.76, 1.01], t(146) = 13.93, p < .001; Std. beta = 1.89, 95% CI
# [1.63, 2.16])
# 
# Standardized parameters were obtained by fitting the model on a standardized
# version of the dataset. 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) and p-values were
# computed using a Wald t-distribution approximation.

Bayesian Models

Bayesian models can also be reported using the new SEXIT framework, which combines clarity, precision and usefulness.

library(rstanarm)

model <- stan_glm(mpg ~ qsec + wt, data = mtcars)

report(model)
# We fitted a Bayesian linear model (estimated using MCMC sampling with 4 chains
# of 1000 iterations and a warmup of 500) to predict mpg with qsec and wt
# (formula: mpg ~ qsec + wt). Priors over parameters were set as normal (mean =
# 0.00, SD = 8.43) distributions. The model's explanatory power is substantial
# (R2 = 0.81, 95% CI [0.70, 0.89], adj. R2 = 0.79). The model's intercept,
# corresponding to qsec = 0 and wt = 0, is at 19.76 (95% CI [9.54, 30.70]).
# Within this model:
# 
#   - The effect of qsec (Median = 0.92, 95% CI [0.36, 1.44]) has a 99.85%
# probability of being positive (> 0), 98.55% of being significant (> 0.30), and
# 0.10% of being large (> 1.81). The estimation successfully converged (Rhat =
# 0.999) and the indices are reliable (ESS = 2316)
#   - The effect of wt (Median = -5.05, 95% CI [-6.03, -4.03]) has a 100.00%
# probability of being negative (< 0), 100.00% of being significant (< -0.30),
# and 100.00% of being large (< -1.81). The estimation successfully converged
# (Rhat = 0.999) and the indices are reliable (ESS = 2115)
# 
# Following the Sequential Effect eXistence and sIgnificance Testing (SEXIT)
# framework, we report the median of the posterior distribution and its 95% CI
# (Highest Density Interval), along the probability of direction (pd), the
# probability of significance and the probability of being large. The thresholds
# beyond which the effect is considered as significant (i.e., non-negligible) and
# large are |0.30| and |1.81| (corresponding respectively to 0.05 and 0.30 of the
# outcome's SD). Convergence and stability of the Bayesian sampling has been
# assessed using R-hat, which should be below 1.01 (Vehtari et al., 2019), and
# Effective Sample Size (ESS), which should be greater than 1000 (Burkner, 2017).
# and We fitted a Bayesian linear model (estimated using MCMC sampling with 4
# chains of 1000 iterations and a warmup of 500) to predict mpg with qsec and wt
# (formula: mpg ~ qsec + wt). Priors over parameters were set as normal (mean =
# 0.00, SD = 15.40) distributions. The model's explanatory power is substantial
# (R2 = 0.81, 95% CI [0.70, 0.89], adj. R2 = 0.79). The model's intercept,
# corresponding to qsec = 0 and wt = 0, is at 19.76 (95% CI [9.54, 30.70]).
# Within this model:
# 
#   - The effect of qsec (Median = 0.92, 95% CI [0.36, 1.44]) has a 99.85%
# probability of being positive (> 0), 98.55% of being significant (> 0.30), and
# 0.10% of being large (> 1.81). The estimation successfully converged (Rhat =
# 0.999) and the indices are reliable (ESS = 2316)
#   - The effect of wt (Median = -5.05, 95% CI [-6.03, -4.03]) has a 100.00%
# probability of being negative (< 0), 100.00% of being significant (< -0.30),
# and 100.00% of being large (< -1.81). The estimation successfully converged
# (Rhat = 0.999) and the indices are reliable (ESS = 2115)
# 
# Following the Sequential Effect eXistence and sIgnificance Testing (SEXIT)
# framework, we report the median of the posterior distribution and its 95% CI
# (Highest Density Interval), along the probability of direction (pd), the
# probability of significance and the probability of being large. The thresholds
# beyond which the effect is considered as significant (i.e., non-negligible) and
# large are |0.30| and |1.81| (corresponding respectively to 0.05 and 0.30 of the
# outcome's SD). Convergence and stability of the Bayesian sampling has been
# assessed using R-hat, which should be below 1.01 (Vehtari et al., 2019), and
# Effective Sample Size (ESS), which should be greater than 1000 (Burkner, 2017).

Other types of reports

Specific parts

One can, for complex reports, directly access the pieces of the reports:

model <- lm(Sepal.Length ~ Species, data = iris)

report_model(model)
report_performance(model)
report_statistics(model)
# linear model (estimated using OLS) to predict Sepal.Length with Species (formula: Sepal.Length ~ Species)
# The model explains a statistically significant and substantial proportion of
# variance (R2 = 0.62, F(2, 147) = 119.26, p < .001, adj. R2 = 0.61)
# beta = 5.01, 95% CI [4.86, 5.15], t(147) = 68.76, p < .001; Std. beta = -1.01, 95% CI [-1.18, -0.84]
# beta = 0.93, 95% CI [0.73, 1.13], t(147) = 9.03, p < .001; Std. beta = 1.12, 95% CI [0.88, 1.37]
# beta = 1.58, 95% CI [1.38, 1.79], t(147) = 15.37, p < .001; Std. beta = 1.91, 95% CI [1.66, 2.16]

Report participants’ details

This can be useful to complete the Participants paragraph of your manuscript.

data <- data.frame(
  "Age" = c(22, 23, 54, 21),
  "Sex" = c("F", "F", "M", "M")
)

paste(
  report_participants(data, spell_n = TRUE),
  "were recruited in the study by means of torture and coercion."
)
# [1] "Four participants (Mean age = 30.0, SD = 16.0, range: [21, 54]; Sex: 50.0% females, 50.0% males, 0.0% other) were recruited in the study by means of torture and coercion."

Report sample

Report can also help you create a sample description table (also referred to as Table 1).

Variable setosa (n=50) versicolor (n=50) virginica (n=50) Total (n=150)
Mean Sepal.Length (SD) 5.01 (0.35) 5.94 (0.52) 6.59 (0.64) 5.84 (0.83)
Mean Sepal.Width (SD) 3.43 (0.38) 2.77 (0.31) 2.97 (0.32) 3.06 (0.44)
Mean Petal.Length (SD) 1.46 (0.17) 4.26 (0.47) 5.55 (0.55) 3.76 (1.77)
Mean Petal.Width (SD) 0.25 (0.11) 1.33 (0.20) 2.03 (0.27) 1.20 (0.76)

Report system and packages

Finally, report includes some functions to help you write the data analysis paragraph about the tools used.

# Analyses were conducted using the R Statistical language (version 4.2.2; R Core
# Team, 2022) on macOS Ventura 13.0.1, using the packages lme4 (version 1.1.31;
# Bates D et al., 2015), Matrix (version 1.5.3; Bates D et al., 2022), Rcpp
# (version 1.0.9; Eddelbuettel D, François R, 2011), rstanarm (version 2.21.3;
# Goodrich B et al., 2022), report (version 0.5.5.3; Makowski D et al., 2021) and
# dplyr (version 1.0.10; Wickham H et al., 2022).
# 
# References
# ----------
#   - Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015). "Fitting LinearMixed-Effects
# Models Using lme4." _Journal of Statistical Software_,*67*(1), 1-48.
# doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01<https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01>.
#   - Bates D, Maechler M, Jagan M (2022). _Matrix: Sparse and Dense MatrixClasses
# and Methods_. R package version
# 1.5-3,<https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Matrix>.
#   - Eddelbuettel D, François R (2011). "Rcpp: Seamless R and C++Integration."
# _Journal of Statistical Software_, *40*(8), 1-18.doi:10.18637/jss.v040.i08
# <https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i08>.Eddelbuettel D (2013). _Seamless R and
# C++ Integration with Rcpp_.Springer, New York.
# doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6868-4<https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6868-4>, ISBN
# 978-1-4614-6867-7.Eddelbuettel D, Balamuta JJ (2018). "Extending extitR with
# extitC++: ABrief Introduction to extitRcpp." _The American Statistician_,
# *72*(1),28-36.
# doi:10.1080/00031305.2017.1375990<https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375990>.
#   - Goodrich B, Gabry J, Ali I, Brilleman S (2022). "rstanarm: Bayesianapplied
# regression modeling via Stan." R package version
# 2.21.3,<https://mc-stan.org/rstanarm/>.Brilleman S, Crowther M, Moreno-Betancur
# M, Buros Novik J, Wolfe R(2018). "Joint longitudinal and time-to-event models
# via Stan." StanCon2018. 10-12 Jan 2018. Pacific Grove, CA,
# USA.,<https://github.com/stan-dev/stancon_talks/>.
#   - Makowski D, Ben-Shachar M, Patil I, Lüdecke D (2021). "AutomatedResults
# Reporting as a Practical Tool to Improve Reproducibility andMethodological Best
# Practices Adoption." _CRAN_.<https://github.com/easystats/report>.
#   - R Core Team (2022). _R: A Language and Environment for StatisticalComputing_.
# R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna,
# Austria.<https://www.R-project.org/>.
#   - Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K (2022). _dplyr: A Grammar ofData
# Manipulation_. R package version
# 1.0.10,<https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr>.

Credits

If you like it, you can put a star on this repo, and cite the package as follows:

citation("report")

To cite in publications use:

  Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M.S., Patil, I. & Lüdecke, D. (2020).
  Automated Results Reporting as a Practical Tool to Improve
  Reproducibility and Methodological Best Practices Adoption. CRAN.
  Available from https://github.com/easystats/report. doi: .

A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is

  @Article{,
    title = {Automated Results Reporting as a Practical Tool to Improve Reproducibility and Methodological Best Practices Adoption},
    author = {Dominique Makowski and Mattan S. Ben-Shachar and Indrajeet Patil and Daniel Lüdecke},
    year = {2021},
    journal = {CRAN},
    url = {https://github.com/easystats/report},
  }

Contribute

report is a young package in need of affection. You can easily be a part of the developing community of this open-source software and improve science! Don’t be shy, try to code and submit a pull request (See the contributing guide). Even if it’s not perfect, we will help you make it great!

Code of Conduct

Please note that the report project is released with a Contributor Code of Conduct. By contributing to this project, you agree to abide by its terms.