is_converged() provides an alternative convergence
test for merMod-objects. For models fitted with Stan (stanfit,
brmsfit and stanreg), it checks the diagnostics of the sampler. For
coxph models, it recomputes the checks of the survival package.
Usage
is_converged(x, tolerance = 0.001, ...)
# S3 method for class 'merMod'
is_converged(x, tolerance = 0.001, verbose = TRUE, ...)
# S3 method for class 'stanfit'
is_converged(x, tolerance = 0.001, verbose = TRUE, ...)
# S3 method for class 'coxph'
is_converged(x, tolerance = 0.001, verbose = TRUE, ...)Arguments
- x
A model object from class
merMod,glmmTMB,glm,lavaan,_glm,stanfit,brmsfit,stanregorcoxph.- tolerance
Indicates up to which value the convergence result is accepted. The smaller
toleranceis, the stricter the test will be. Not used for Stan andcoxphmodels.- ...
Currently not used.
- verbose
Toggle messages and warnings.
Value
TRUE if convergence is fine and FALSE if convergence is
suspicious or cannot be assessed. For merMod models, the convergence
value is returned as attribute gradient. If the model is singular,
convergence is determined by the optimizer's convergence code. For
non-singular models where derivatives are unavailable, FALSE is returned
and a message is printed to indicate that convergence cannot be assessed
through the usual gradient-based checks.
For Stan models, the attribute diagnostics is a data frame with the
value, the threshold and the result of each check. For Stan models whose
convergence cannot be assessed, FALSE is returned without this attribute,
and a message gives the reason: models without MCMC draws from the NUTS
sampler (for example, models fitted with variational inference or
optimization), models without draws after warmup, and models fitted with
brms::brm_multiple(), whose chains come from different data sets (such
as imputed ones).
For coxph models, the attribute diagnostics is a data frame with the
result of each check. If convergence cannot be assessed, FALSE is
returned without this attribute, and, if verbose = TRUE, a message gives
the reason.
Stan models
For models fitted with Stan, is_converged() returns FALSE if at least one
of the checks below fails. The checks and thresholds are those of the
warnings that rstan gives after sampling, and the values are computed with
functions from rstan:
Divergent transitions after warmup (
rstan::get_num_divergent()): the check fails if there is at least one.Transitions after warmup that reach the maximum treedepth (
rstan::get_num_max_treedepth()): the check fails if there is at least one.E-BFMI (
rstan::get_bfmi()): the check fails if at least one chain has a value below 0.2. This is the E-BFMI ofrstan::check_hmc_diagnostics(), which can differ from the warning that rstan prints after sampling.R-hat (
rstan::Rhat()): the check fails if the largest value over all parameters is above 1.05.Bulk and tail effective sample size (
rstan::ess_bulk()andrstan::ess_tail()): each check fails if the smallest value over all parameters is below 100 times the number of chains.
Missing values (for example, R-hat of a constant parameter) are ignored. Stan also prints messages about rejected proposals ("exception thrown") during sampling. These messages are not checked, because the model object does not store them.
Convergence and log-likelihood
Convergence problems typically arise when the model hasn't converged to a solution where the log-likelihood has a true maximum. This may result in unreliable and overly complex (or non-estimable) estimates and standard errors.
Inspect model convergence
lme4 performs a convergence-check (see ?lme4::convergence), however, as
discussed here and suggested by
one of the lme4-authors in this comment,
this check can be too strict. is_converged() (and its wrapper function,
performance::check_convergence()) thus provides an alternative convergence
test for merMod-objects.
Resolving convergence issues
Convergence issues are not easy to diagnose. The help page on
?lme4::convergence provides most of the current advice about how to resolve
convergence issues. In general, convergence issues may be addressed by one or
more of the following strategies: 1. Rescale continuous predictors; 2. try a
different optimizer; 3. increase the number of iterations; or, if everything
else fails, 4. simplify the model. Another clue might be large parameter
values, e.g. estimates (on the scale of the linear predictor) larger than 10
in (non-identity link) generalized linear model might indicate complete
separation, which can be addressed by regularization, e.g. penalized
regression or Bayesian regression with appropriate priors on the fixed
effects.
Cox proportional hazards models
survival warns about convergence problems when a coxph model is fitted,
but does not store the warnings in the model object. For coxph models,
is_converged() therefore computes the two checks of survival again,
with the iter.max, eps and toler.inf values of the model call:
Iterations: the check fails if the model did not converge within
iter.maxiterations ("Ran out of iterations and did not converge").Infinite coefficient: the check fails for a coefficient if the log-likelihood converged before the coefficient did ("Loglik converged before variable ...; coefficient may be infinite", or "beta may be infinite" for counting-process data). This happens, for example, if a factor level has no events. As in survival, this check runs only if the first check passed.
is_converged() returns FALSE if a check fails. The attribute
diagnostics is a data frame with the value, the threshold and the result
of each check, with one row for each coefficient for the second check. The
tolerance argument is not used for coxph models.
Convergence cannot be assessed, and FALSE is returned, for penalized
models (with frailty(), ridge() or pspline() terms), for models with
ties = "exact", for models with tt() terms, for models with iter.max
of 1 or less, for models fitted with y = FALSE, for model objects without
a call, and if the control arguments of the model call or the score
residuals cannot be computed. Objects of other classes that inherit from
coxph, for example from survival::clogit() or survey::svycoxph(), are
not supported: NULL is returned with a message.
For models with right-censored data, the score residuals are computed from
the data of the model call, unless the model was fitted with model = TRUE
or x = TRUE. If these data were removed after the model was fitted,
convergence cannot be assessed. If they were changed, the result can be
wrong. In both cases, refit the model with model = TRUE.
Convergence versus Singularity
Note the different meaning between singularity and convergence: singularity indicates an issue with the "true" best estimate, i.e. whether the maximum likelihood estimation for the variance-covariance matrix of the random effects is positive definite or only semi-definite. Convergence is a question of whether we can assume that the numerical optimization has worked correctly or not. A convergence failure means the optimizer (the algorithm) could not find a stable solution (Bates et. al 2015).
For singular models (see ?lme4::isSingular), convergence is determined
based on the optimizer's convergence code. If the optimizer reports
successful convergence (convergence code 0) for a singular model,
is_converged() returns TRUE. For non-singular models, in cases where the
gradient and Hessian are not available, is_converged() returns FALSE and
prints a message to indicate that convergence cannot be assessed through the
usual gradient-based checks. Note that performance::check_convergence() is
a wrapper around insight::is_converged().
References
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Examples
library(lme4)
data(cbpp)
set.seed(1)
cbpp$x <- rnorm(nrow(cbpp))
cbpp$x2 <- runif(nrow(cbpp))
model <- glmer(
cbind(incidence, size - incidence) ~ period + x + x2 + (1 + x | herd),
data = cbpp,
family = binomial()
)
#> boundary (singular) fit: see help('isSingular')
is_converged(model)
#> [1] TRUE
#> attr(,"gradient")
#> [1] NA
# \donttest{
library(glmmTMB)
model <- glmmTMB(
Sepal.Length ~ poly(Petal.Width, 4) * poly(Petal.Length, 4) +
(1 + poly(Petal.Width, 4) | Species),
data = iris
)
#> Warning: Model convergence problem; non-positive-definite Hessian matrix. See vignette('troubleshooting')
#> Warning: Model convergence problem; false convergence (8). See vignette('troubleshooting'), help('diagnose')
is_converged(model)
#> [1] FALSE
# }
# \donttest{
# a model fitted with brms
model <- download_model("brms_1")
result <- is_converged(model)
result
#> [1] TRUE
#> attr(,"diagnostics")
#> Diagnostic Value Threshold Passed
#> 1 Divergences 0.0000000 0.00 TRUE
#> 2 Treedepth 0.0000000 0.00 TRUE
#> 3 E-BFMI 0.8455105 0.20 TRUE
#> 4 Rhat 1.0021166 1.05 TRUE
#> 5 ESS_bulk 1631.5978432 400.00 TRUE
#> 6 ESS_tail 1918.0354686 400.00 TRUE
attributes(result)$diagnostics
#> Diagnostic Value Threshold Passed
#> 1 Divergences 0.0000000 0.00 TRUE
#> 2 Treedepth 0.0000000 0.00 TRUE
#> 3 E-BFMI 0.8455105 0.20 TRUE
#> 4 Rhat 1.0021166 1.05 TRUE
#> 5 ESS_bulk 1631.5978432 400.00 TRUE
#> 6 ESS_tail 1918.0354686 400.00 TRUE
# }
